General Resources / Legal Resources / Medical
Resources / Briefing Papers / State Activity
Hospital Closures / Preventable
Tragedies / Press Room / Search
Our Site / Home
Treatment Advocacy Center
NEWS
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 26, 1998 |
CONTACT: |
703 294
6008 or [email protected] |
Treatment Advocacy Center Supports Pew Health Professions Commission Recommendation
Arlington, VA The Treatment Advocacy Center today signaled its support of a proposal released last Friday by the Pew Health Professions Commission to initiate regular competency tests for American health care providers especially in the area of psychiatry to ensure public safety.Under the current health care system, doctors become licensed when they complete their training and are never again tested on their skills. Some physicians elect to take specialty board certification exams, which are usually voluntary and on a one-time basis. Among psychiatrists, only half have taken the elective specialty board exam, which is one of the lowest percentages among all medical specialties in the country.
"It is outrageous that half of all practicing psychiatrists in the United States have never demonstrated their medical and psychiatric skills since originally receiving a license to practice medicine," said Dr. E. Fuller Torrey, Treatment Advocacy Center President and leading research psychiatrist specializing in schizophrenia. "Adding to this scandal are the older psychiatrists who have never been tested on their knowledge even though they received their diplomas in the 1940s and 1950s, before the introduction of any antipsychotic or antidepressant drugs.
"The amount of incompetent care being given by psychiatrists is the psychiatric professions dirty little secret," said Torrey. "The American Psychiatric Association is silent on this issue, as are the National Institute of Mental Health and the Center for Mental Health Services."
There is abundant evidence that psychiatrists need to become updated in their knowledge and to demonstrate competency. Earlier this year, the National Institute of Mental Health released the results of the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team study (PORT), which found that more than half of individuals with schizophrenia today receive substandard care. Specifically, the study found that only 29 percent of patients with schizophrenia received the appropriate dose of antipsychotic medication, only half received appropriate treatment for the side effects of their medications, and fewer than half who had symptoms of depression were given antidepressant medication.
Another recent indicator of the need for psychiatrists to update their skills and knowledge was evident in a report issued in June 1998 by Public Citizen Health Research Group on inappropriate sexual contact between doctors and patients. Among all medical specialties, it was noted that psychiatrists have one of the highest incidences of such improper contact.
Torrey said that licensing inadequacies at the state level make the problem of incompetent care worse. "It has been common knowledge for many years that state mental health systems employ physicians who not only are not certified in psychiatry, but are not even capable of passing their basic medical licensing exam," said Torrey. "States are able to sanction such disreputable practices by issuing permits that allow the unlicensed physician to work only in the state mental health system. The doctor can provide care for public patients, but not for private patients."
According to a 1990 study by the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, "Physician Limited Licensure," a total of 21 states issued permits allowing unlicensed physicians to practice in their state mental health system: Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, and Rhode Island.
The best known and tragic example of incompetent psychiatric care was the highly publicized 1972 case of an unlicensed physician who was assigned to work at Elgin State Hospital in Illinois on a state permit. He was originally assigned to perform autopsies, but according to the Chicago Tribune (March 1, 1972) he "demonstrated total incompetence in working with corpses, so mental health officials demoted him by transferring him to the hospital wards where he treated live patients." According to the newspaper, this doctor was later investigated in connection with 18 patient deaths. Equally disturbing was the fact that the state-employed physician who was responsible for approving the first physicians credentials had himself failed the state licensing examination 10 times.
In addition, Torrey said there is abundant anecdotal evidence that there are many incompetent psychiatrists practicing today. "Patients and their families regularly complain about psychiatrists in both the public and private sectors who are not up-to-date in their knowledge," said Torrey. "This is an increasing problem because many advanced medications have been introduced in recent years for the treatment of schizophrenia, manic-depressive illness, depression, and other psychiatric disorders, and doctors just arent keeping current. It is likely that the amount of incompetent psychiatric care will only increase as more new medications become available.
The solution is obvious and simple," said Torrey. "We must institute a system of mandatory certification for psychiatrists, followed by periodic examination and recertification. The psychiatric profession, unfortunately, is likely to continue to oppose any movement in this direction." A recent article in the American Journal of Psychiatry noted that "psychiatrists have generally resisted attempts to implement recertification."
Both the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the American Medical Association (AMA) argue that mandatory recertification is unnecessary because all physicians are required to undergo a specified number of hours of "continuing medical education" each year. "What the APA and AMA dont say, is that many continuing medical education courses are nothing more than junket vacations that psychiatrists write off on their income taxes," Torrey said.
Citing several examples, Torrey said that currently available for "continuing medical education" for psychiatrists and other physicians are two- to three-week trips to "Gourmet France," a "Yangtze River Journey," and a "Kenya and Tanzania Safari" under the Academy for International Medical Studies, Inc. Torrey said if these adventures do not appeal to doctors there are others. For example, a psychiatrist may meet the requirement for "continuing medical education" credits by climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania, hiking the Inca Trail in Peru, rafting in Chile, or trekking to the base of Mt. Everest in Nepal under an organization called Seminars in Wilderness Medicine.
"The Northern California Psychiatric Society has even organized its own accredited sham continuing education program by sponsoring an annual trip to the Santa Fe opera," said Torrey. "This so-called psychiatric education includes lectures such as Reality in Art: Mozart and Puccini and Their Works. Psychiatrists are undoubtedly the only professionals who can go to the opera, get credit as continuing medial education, and write it off their taxes."
"Meanwhile, back in the real world, psychiatric patients who cannot go to the opera and write it off their taxes continue to suffer because of incompetent psychiatric care," Torrey said. "Individuals with schizophrenia, manic-depressive illness, and severe depression continue to receive inappropriate and/or inadequate medication and to experience side effects that are not treated.
"Patients are not rehabilitated or offered the most recent advances in treatment," said Torrey. "And, the situation appears to be getting worse."
To effectively address the inadequacies of todays psychiatric health care system and the incompetence of its doctors, the Treatment Advocacy Center recommends:
###
The Treatment Advocacy Center (www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org) is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating barriers to the timely and effective treatment of severe mental illnesses. TAC promotes laws, policies, and practices for the delivery of psychiatric care and supports the development of innovative treatments for and research into the causes of severe and persistent psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
general
resources | legal resources | medical
resources | briefing papers | state activity
hospital closures | preventable
tragedies | press room | search
| home
The contents of TAC's website are copyrighted by the Treatment Advocacy Center unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved and content may be reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, or transferred, for single use, or by nonprofit organizations for educational purposes only, if correct attribution is made. TAC is an I.R.C. � 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation. Donations are appreciated and are eligible for the charitable contribution deduction under the provisions of I.R.C. � 170. Please note that TAC does not accept funding from pharmaceutical companies or entities involved in the sale, marketing, or distribution of such products. Treatment Advocacy Center (TAC), 200 N. Glebe Road, Suite 730, Arlington, VA 22203 703 294 6001/6002 (phone) | 703 294 6010 (fax) | www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org (website) [email protected] (general email) | [email protected] (press contact) [email protected] (webmaster) |