General Resources / Legal Resources / Medical Resources / Briefing Papers / State Activity    
Hospital Closures / Preventable Tragedies / Press Room / Search Our Site / Home

ANALYSIS OF GEORGIA'S ASSISTED TREATMENT LAWS

STATUTORY COMPILATION USED: Official Code of Georgia, Published by Michie

Current Through: Official Code of Georgia Annotated 1998 Supplement Including Acts of the 1998 Session of the General Assembly

Analysis Completed: 8/99

NOTES:

  1. Georgia’s Examination, Treatment, Etc., For Mental Illness section is located at Title 37, Chapter 3, Section 1, et seq.
  2. Parts enclosed with quotation marks are exact, although sometimes abridged, language from the Georgia Code.
  1. When not the subject of a pending commitment action, what are the prerequisites for an individual to receive voluntarily treatment?

    Ga. Code Ann. § 37-3-20(a). "The chief medical officer of any facility may receive for observation and diagnosis any patient 12 years of age or older making application therefor, any patient under 18 years of age for whom such application is made by his parent or guardian, and any patient who has been declared legally incompetent and for whom such application is made by his guardian. If found to show evidence of mental illness and to be suitable for treatment, such person may be given care and treatment at such facility…" "The parents or guardian of a minor child must give written consent to such treatment…"

  2. Conditions necessary for emergency treatment/observation.

    § 37-3-41(a). "Any physician within this state may execute a certificate stating that he has personally examined a person within the preceding 48 hours and found that, based upon observations set forth in the certificate, the person appears to be a ‘mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment’."

    § 37-3-41(d). "Any psychologist, clinical social worker, or clinical nurse specialist in psychiatric/mental health may perform any act specified by this Code section to be performed by a physician."

    § 37-3-42(a). "A [police officer] may take any person to a physician within the county or an adjoining county for emergency examination by the physician, or directly to an emergency receiving facility if (1) the person is committing a penal offense, and (2) the peace officer has probable cause for believing that the person is a ‘mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment’."

    § 37-1-1(4). "‘Peace Officer’ means any federal, city, or county police officer, any officer of the Georgia State Patrol, or any sheriff or deputy sheriff."

    § 37-3-1(12). ‘Mentally person requiring involuntary treatment’ is defined as "…a person who is an inpatient or an outpatient." "Inpatient" is defined in No. 12 and "outpatient" is defined in No. 23.

  3. Is mental illness/disorder defined?

    § 37-3-1(11). "‘Mentally ill’ means having a disorder of thought or mood which significantly impairs judgment, behavior, capacity to recognize reality, or ability to cope with the ordinary demands of life."

  4. Maximum duration of emergency treatment/observation before a judicial hearing must be held.

    The maximum duration of emergency treatment prior to a hearing varies depending upon the specific circumstances. Listed directly below are the three scenarios, with explanations of their respective maximum emergency treatment durations. The statutes listed below the three scenarios apply to all three scenarios, unless indicated up front. Also note that all of these maximum numbers could be extended under § 37-3-81(a); this section allows a patient to be kept at an evaluating facility beyond the five-day evaluation period upon the recommendation of the chief medical officer, whose recommendation must be supported by the opinions of two physicians or a physician and a psychologist.

    Scenario 1: Police Officer takes person directly to "emergency receiving facility."

    Comment: When a police officer takes a person directly to an "emergency receiving facility," the maximum duration of emergency treatment is the 48 hours the person could spend in at the emergency facility, added to the 24 hours within which the certificate is executed, added to the five-day maximum detained time in an evaluating facility (which potentially could be eight days since Saturdays, Sundays and holidays are excluded), added to the maximum of 12 days (after filing the petition) before the hearing must be held. Thus, the total potential maximum days before a hearing must be held, when a police officer takes the person directly to an emergency facility, is 23.

    Scenario 2: Police Officer takes person to physician for certification (or physician executes certificate on his own).

    Comment: When a physician initiates a certificate on his own, or a police officer takes a person to a physician for certification, the maximum duration of emergency treatment is the 24 hours within which the certificate is executed, added to the five-day maximum detained time in an evaluating facility (which potentially could be eight days since Saturdays, Sundays and holidays are excluded), added to the maximum 12 days (after filing the petition) before the hearing must be held. Thus, the total, potential maximum days before a hearing must held, when a physician initiates a certificate, is 21.

    Scenario 3: "Any person" files a petition (includes physician’s certificate), department files petition for hearing.

    Comment: When "any person" files a petition (which must be accompanied by a physician’s certificate), the maximum duration of treatment is the five days maximum detained time in an evaluating facility (which potentially could be eight days since Saturdays, Sundays and holidays are excluded), added to the maximum 12 days (after filing the petition) before the hearing. Thus, the total, potential maximum days before a hearing must held, when a physician initiates a certificate and the department files a petition, is 20.

    Applies only to Scenario 1: § 37-3-43(a). A patient admitted to an "emergency receiving facility" shall be examined, and discharged within 48 hours unless:

    (1). "An examining physician or psychologist concludes that there is reason to believe that the patient may a mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment and executes a certificate to that effect within such time; or

    (2). the patient is under criminal charges…"

    § 37-3-1(5). "‘Emergency receiving facility’ means a facility designated by the department to receive patients under emergency conditions…"

    Applies only to Scenario 1 and 2: § 37-3-43(b). "Within 24 hours of execution of the certificate…the patient shall be transported…to an evaluating facility…unless the patient has been determined and certified to meet all of the outpatient treatment requirements…in which event the patient shall be discharged [to an outpatient "receiving facility" pending a hearing on the matter]."

    Statutes applicable to Scenarios 1, 2, and 3.

    § 37-3-64(a). A patient admitted to an evaluating facility, by way of an emergency admission or petition, may be detained for no longer than five days, Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excluded. The patient shall be discharged upon a finding that he is not a "mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment" or transported to outpatient treatment, if outpatient criteria are met. During the five-day period the patient may also be admitted as a voluntary patient.

    § 37-3-81(a). The patient may be kept at the evaluating facility beyond the five-day evaluation period upon the recommendation of the chief medical officer of the facility, whose recommendation must be supported by the opinions of two physicians or a physician and a psychologist. The two physicians or the physician and psychologist must agree with the chief medical officer "…that the patient is a mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment but who does not meet the outpatient treatment requirements."

    "The certificate shall be filed along with a petition for a hearing [filed by the department]…within five days, Saturdays, Sundays and holidays excluded, after the patient is admitted to a facility for evaluation…" This filing shall authorize detention of the patient, until completion of the hearing.

    § 37-3-81(c). The patient is retained in the evaluating facility until a "…full and fair…" hearing is held, between 7 and 12 days after the department’s petition is filed.

    § 37-3-1(6). "‘Evaluating facility’ means a facility designated by the department to receive patients for psychiatric evaluation…"

    Note: This petition is for a judicial hearing on commitment; it should be distinguished from the petition filed to initiate proceedings. This hearing is the traditional involuntary commitment, judicial hearing; it should be distinguished from an initial hearing held on a petition. The initial petition and the hearing on that petition, are discussed in No. 8.

  5. Can a potential committee avoid a hearing determination by opting to voluntarily undergo treatment and, if so, what is the minimum time he or she must then spend in treatment?

    § 37-3-64(b). Yes. "Staff physicians or psychologists of the evaluating facility shall encourage the patient to apply for voluntary hospitalization, if the patient so wishes."

    The potential minimum time a patient requesting release may spend in treatment is the 24 hours within which the patient is given to write an oral request, added to 24 hours for delivery of request to the chief medical officer (which potentially could be four days since Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays are excluded), added to the 72 hour, prior to discharge (which potentially could be five days since Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays are excluded). Since only one of the potential maximums would be realized in any one calendar week, the minimum amount of time the person could spend in treatment is 8 days.

    § 37-3-22. "If the patient or another on his behalf makes an oral request for release to any member of the staff or other service provider, the patient must within 24 hours be given assistance in preparing a written request. The person to whom a written request is submitted shall deliver the request to the chief medical officer within 24 hours, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays excluded. Within 72 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, of the delivery of a written request for release to the chief medical officer the patient must be discharged from the facility, unless the chief medical officer finds that the discharge would be unsafe for the patient or others, in which case proceedings for involuntary treatment must be initiated…"

  6. Are there any requirements that a potential committee be capable of deciding to voluntarily undergo treatment?

    § 37-3-64(b). Yes. If "…the attending physician or treating psychologist finds that the patient is unable to understand the nature of voluntary hospitalization, that voluntary hospitalization would be harmful to the patient, or that the patient is determined to be a mentally ill person in need of involuntary treatment," he/she shall not encourage the patient to apply for voluntary hospitalization.

    § 37-3-24 also addresses this issue. It adds, "Any involuntary patient may apply to be transferred to voluntary status of hospitalization and shall be so transferred if he is able to understand and exercise the rights and powers of a voluntary patient unless the chief medical officer finds that this would not be in the best interest of the patient…"

  7. Who may petition for an individual to receive assisted inpatient treatment?

    Application to department: § 37-3-61(1). "Any person may file an application...with the community mental health center for a court ordered evaluation of a person...."

    Petition to court: § 37-3-61(2). "Any person may file with the court a petition..."

  8. Required elements of a petition.

    Application to department: § 37-3-61(1). "Any person may file an application executed under oath with the community mental health center for a court ordered evaluation of a person located within that county who is alleged by such application to be a mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment. Upon the filing of such application, the community mental health center shall make a preliminary investigation and, if the investigation shows that there is probable cause to believe that such allegation is true, it shall file a petition with the court in the county where the patient is located seeking an involuntary admission for evaluation." Although unstated, the court-ordered evaluation probably results in physician certification.

    Petition to court: § 37-3-61(2). "Any person may file with the court a petition executed under oath alleging that a person within the county is a mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment. The petition must be accompanied by the certificate of a physician or psychologist stating that he has examined the patient within the preceding five days and has found that the patient may be a mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment and that a full evaluation of the patient is necessary."

    Physician’s certificate: § 37-3-41 (a). "Any physician within this state may execute a certificate stating that he has personally examined a person within the preceding 48 hours and found that, based upon observations set forth in the certificate, the person appears to be a mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment. A physician's certificate shall expire seven days after it is executed." Within 72 hours after receiving the certificate, a peace officer (policeman) shall make "diligent efforts" to take the person into custody and deliver him/her to the nearest available emergency receiving facility.

    Court review of petition filed by "anyone": § 37-3-62(a). "The court shall review the petition [filed by any person] and, if it finds reasonable cause to believe that the patient may be a mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment, the court shall hold a full and fair hearing on the petition [between 10 and 15 days] after such petition is filed." (b). "After a full and fair hearing or, if the hearing is waived, after a full review of the evidence, if the court is satisfied that immediate evaluation is necessary, the court shall issue an order to any [policeman] to deliver the patient [to an evaluating facility]."

  9. Is there a penalty for filing an unfounded petition?

    Not discussed in Mental Health Law.

  10. Participation of other individuals in assisted treatment hearing (i.e. notice, a right to be heard or standing for family members, legal guardians, doctors, etc.).

    The Georgia Code outlines a procedure for the appointment of "representatives" for mentally ill patients. The appointment procedure and rights of representatives are discussed in Georgia Code § 37-3-147 and 148, and summarized in No. 27 of this paper.

    § 37-3-81(a). "Copies of the certificate shall be served on the patient’s representatives within five days after the certificate is filed and shall be accompanied by notice…[of the patient’s rights]…

    Note: Other than appointed representatives, there are no provisions in the Mental Health Law for the participation of family members, legal guardians, or doctors.

  11. Length of initial term of assisted inpatient treatment.
  12. § 37-3-81.1(c). Any period not to exceed six months.

  13. Conditions necessary for judicially ordered inpatient treatment (exact wording of key portions of applicable statute desired).
  14. The court may order involuntary inpatient treatment if the patient meets the definition of an "inpatient."

    § 37-3-1(9.1). "‘Inpatient’ means a person who is mentally ill and:

    (A)(i). Who presents a substantial risk of imminent harm to that person or others, as manifested by either recent overt acts or recent expressed threats of violence which present a probability of physical injury to that person or other persons; or

    (ii). Who is so unable to care for that person's own physical health and safety as to create an imminently life-endangering crisis; and

    (B). Who is in need of involuntary inpatient treatment."

  15. Evidentiary standard under which eligibility for assisted treatment is judged (two most common are "beyond a reasonable doubt" and "clear and convincing evidence").
  16. § 37-3-1(8). Clear and convincing evidence.

  17. Is there a least restrictive treatment requirement?
  18. § 37-3-161. "It is the policy of the state that the least restrictive alternative placement be secured for every patient at every stage of his medical treatment and care. It shall be the duty of the facility to assist the patient in securing placement in noninstitutional community facilities and programs."

    § 37-3-1(9)(E). Each patient’s individual service plan must include, among other things, "a statement attesting that the chief medical officer has made a reasonable effort to meet the plan's individualized treatment goals in the least restrictive environment possible closest to the patient's home community."

  19. Is there a confidentiality exception for family members of committees and/or individuals undergoing emergency evaluations?
  20. No. However, under § 37-3-166(2), a copy of the record may be released to a person or entity designated in writing by the patient or, if appropriate, the parent or person retaining legal custody of a minor or the legal guardian of an adult or minor.

  21. Are advance directives or durable powers of attorney addressed and, if so, in what way?
  22. Not discussed in Mental Health Law.

  23. Is there a separate proceeding necessary to abrogate a committee’s right to refuse treatment?
  24. § 37-3-163(c). A separate proceeding is necessary for a committee to object to the treatment being administered to him. The committee or his/her representative has a right to request a protective order to object to treatment, under § 37-3-148, which is discussed further in No. 27.

    Note: § 37-3-163(b). A physician who determines that a patient’s refusal to take medication would be unsafe to the patient or others, can order continued medication treatment, with a concurring opinion from a second, without patient consent.

    Note: § 37-3-163(e). "In cases of grave emergency…" when at least two physicians determine that intervention (medication) is necessary and delay in obtaining patient consent would create "grave danger" to the patient, intervention may be administered without consent. Any physician, agent, employee or official who acts under this provision shall be immune from liability, if he/she acted in good faith in administering intervention.

  25. Does the treating hospital and/or physician have discretion to release individuals before the end of their assisted inpatient care periods?
  26. § 37-3-85(b). Yes. "Any time a patient receiving involuntary inpatient treatment is found by the chief medical officer, after consideration of the recommendations of the treatment team, no longer to be a mentally ill person requiring involuntary inpatient treatment, the chief medical officer may…discharge the patient from involuntary outpatient or inpatient treatment, or both…"

    (c). "The chief medical officer may designate in writing another physician, who may be the attending physician, to make these discharge decisions. If the decision of the designee is contrary to the recommendations of the treatment team, the issue must go to the chief medical officer for final determination. Where the treatment team and the designee concur, the decision of the designee will be final."

  27. Individual(s) who may decide to initiate new periods of assisted treatment.
  28. § 37-3-83(d). The chief medical officer may seek an order authorizing continued involuntary treatment.

    (c). "A Committee for Continued Involuntary Treatment Review shall be established by the chief medical officer of each hospital and shall consist of not less than five persons of professional status, at least one of whom shall be a physician and at least two others of whom shall be either physicians or psychologists. The committee may conduct its meetings with a quorum of any three members at least one of whom shall be a physician. The function of this committee shall be to review and evaluate the updated individualized service plan of each patient of the hospital and to report to the chief medical officer its recommendations concerning the patient's need for continued involuntary treatment. No person who has responsibility for the care and treatment of the individual patient for whom continued involuntary treatment is requested shall serve on any committee which reviews such individual's case."

    (e). The committee, described in subsection (c), shall meet to consider to the chief medical officer’s order for continued involuntary treatment. The committee shall report its written recommendations to the chief medical officer. This report will specify whether "…the patient is a ‘mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment’ and whether continued hospitalization is the least restrictive alternative available."

    (g). If the chief medical officer, after considering the committee’s recommendations, determines that the patient is a "mentally ill person requiring involuntary treatment," he shall serve a petition for an order authorizing continued involuntary treatment on the designated office within the department. The petition shall state that the patient or his/her representatives may file a request for a hearing.

    Note: If any committee member suggests discharge, there is a assisted hearing under § 37-3-83(h).

  29. Type of forum that decides on need for extended assisted treatment (normally either judicial or administrative).
  30. § 37-3-84(a). "One or more hearing examiners shall be appointed by the Justices of the Supreme Court to hold hearings. Such hearing examiners shall be members of the State Bar of Georgia and shall be compensated by the department."

    § 37-3-83(h). "If a hearing is not requested by the patient or the representatives within 15 days of service of the petition on the patient and his representatives, the hearing examiner shall make an independent review of the committee's report, the updated individualized service plan, and the petition. If he concludes that continued involuntary treatment may not be necessary or if he finds any member of the committee so concluded, then he shall order that a hearing be held pursuant to subsection (i) of this Code section. If he concludes that continued involuntary treatment is necessary, then he shall order continued involuntary treatment involving inpatient treatment, outpatient treatment, or both for a period not to exceed one year."

    (i). "If a hearing is requested within 15 days of service of the petition on the patient and his representatives or if the hearing examiner orders a hearing…, the hearing examiner shall set a time and place for the hearing to be held within 25 days of the time the hearing examiner receives the request but in any event no later than the day on which the current order of involuntary inpatient treatment expires."

    Comment: § 37-3-83(h). If a hearing is not requested by the patient or his/her representatives, the hearing examiner makes an independent review. If the hearing examiner finds that continued involuntary treatment is not necessary, then a hearing is assisted. However, if the hearing examiner finds that continued involuntary treatment is necessary, a hearing is not assisted.

    Comment: The procedure described in § 37-3-83(h) is known as preliminary check. Preliminary check benefits the inpatient as it expedites the continued treatment process. Since a hearing is not assisted (after a hearing examiner finds that continued involuntary inpatient treatment is necessary) the inpatient is allowed to continue uninterrupted involuntary treatment. This all assumes that the inpatient or any representatives did not request a hearing.

     

  31. Participation of other individuals in the extension hearing (i.e. notice, a right to be heard and/or right to counsel for family members, legal guardians, doctors, etc.).
  32. § 37-3-83(e). The patient’s representatives shall be notified of the purpose of such meeting, the time and place of such meeting, their right to be present at such meeting, and their right to present any alternative individualized service plan secured at their expense.

  33. Maximum length of subsequent assisted inpatient treatment (and of any possible subsequent periods).

  34. § 37-3-83(e).
    1 year.

    Comment: Section § 37-3-83 generally appears to be applicable for each procedure for continued involuntary inpatient commitment, thus, it probably follows that any possible subsequent periods would also hold a maximum length of one year.

  35. Alternative(s) to assisted inpatient treatment (i.e. conditional release, trial release, assisted outpatient treatment, etc.) and conditions necessary for a court to order placement in alternative(s) (if more than one form, specify for each).
  36. Trial Release:
    § 37-3-91(a). A person kept in any facility, who is determined by a physician or psychologist, to meet all of the outpatient treatment requirements shall be discharged, pending a full and fair hearing or waiver. (b). A treating psychologist shall obtain the concurrence of a physician before discharging. Discharge from a community health center shall occur within four hours after the patient’s examination, discharge from an emergency receiving facility, within 48 hours after patient’s admission, and discharge from an evaluating within the five-day evaluation period.

    § 37-3-91(d). "Within three days after a referring facility has discharged a patient…that facility shall transmit to the receiving facility…[all]…necessary clinical information. Within five days after receiving such information, the receiving [outpatient] facility shall petition the court…for a full and fair hearing…" This hearing may not be waived by any patient determined to meet all of the outpatient treatment requirements, under subsection (e) of this Code section.

    § 37-3-85(b)(2). Anytime an inpatient receiving involuntary treatment is found by the chief medical officer, after consideration of the recommendations of the treatment team, no longer to be a mentally ill person requiring involuntary inpatient treatment, the chief medical officer may require that patient obtain available outpatient treatment if that patient meets the requirements of the court discussed below, in § 37-3-81.1(a)(2).

    § 37-3-91(e). To transfer a patient from inpatient to outpatient treatment, a hearing must be held; it cannot be waived.

    § 37-3-81.1(a)(2). At such hearing, the court must determine "…whether there is available outpatient treatment for the patient which meets the requirements of the plan chosen by the court and whether the patient will likely obtain that treatment so as to minimize the likelihood of the patient’s becoming an inpatient." If the court determines this to be true, then it shall discharge the patient, ordering him to the outpatient treatment.

    Assisted Outpatient Treatment:
    A new patient can receive outpatient treatment either by way of emergency commitment or the petition/certification process discussed in No. 4. In either instance, an evaluating physician can make a recommendation for outpatient treatment and a hearing is held. In this instance, the court must order the outpatient treatment if the requirements in § 37-3-81.1(a)(2) (discussed directly above) are met.

    § 37-3-64. The evaluating physician shall evaluate the patient, within five days, either classifying the patient as one who is a candidate for involuntary treatment, as one who meets the outpatient treatment requirements, as one who qualifies and wishes for voluntary admission, or one who is not a mentally ill person requiring treatment. If the chief medical officer determines that the patient is a candidate for involuntary treatment, proceedings for involuntary treatment of the patient shall be initiated.

    § 37-3-90(c). During initial examinations, the evaluating physician or psychologist may certify a patient as an outpatient when that patient meets the definition of an outpatient and that the patient is one for whom outpatient treatment is available. ‘Outpatient’ is defined under § 37-3-1(12.1) as a person who is mentally ill and:

    "(A) Who is not an inpatient but who, based on the person's treatment history or current mental status, will require `outpatient treatment in order to avoid predictably and imminently becoming an inpatient;

    (B) Who because of the person's current mental status, mental history, or nature of the person's mental illness is unable voluntarily to seek or comply with outpatient treatment; and

    (C) Who is in need of involuntary treatment."

    § 37-3-1(12.2). "‘Outpatient treatment’ means a program of treatment for mental illness outside a hospital facility setting which includes, without being limited to, medication and prescription monitoring, individual or group therapy, day or partial programming activities, case management services, and other services to alleviate or treat the patient's mental illness so as to maintain the patient's semi-independent functioning and to prevent the patient's becoming an inpatient."

  37. Maximum duration of alternative(s) to assisted inpatient treatment.
  38. Trial Release under § 37-3-85(b)(2). The patient must obtain outpatient treatment for the remaining period the patient would have been required to obtain inpatient treatment.

    Assisted Outpatient Treatment under § 37-3-93(a). Outpatient treatment may be ordered for a period not to exceed one year.

  39. Procedure necessary to transfer patient from outpatient to inpatient care.
  40. § 37-3-82(a). "If at any time during a period of involuntary outpatient treatment…the physician or psychologist in charge of the patient's outpatient service plan determines that, because of a change in the patient's condition, the least restrictive alternative which would accomplish the treatment goals is hospitalization of the patient, then that physician or psychologist may execute a certificate under the conditions specified [in § 37-3-41(a)] [which allows the physician to certify the patient as one needing involuntary inpatient treatment]." The patient will be delivered to an emergency receiving facility and will be examined, in accordance with procedures discussed in No. 7 and No. 8.

    Note: Since the statute cites § 37-3-41(a) on certification and since the statute provides no other information on the matter, it appears that any additional procedures, including a hearing under § 37-3-81(a),(c), also would follow. However, since the Georgia Code does not explicitly state as such, this should not be assumed to be the law.

     

  41. Procedure necessary to institute and maximum duration of subsequent periods of alternative(s) to inpatient assisted treatment.
  42. § 37-3-93(b)(1). "If it is necessary to continue available outpatient treatment beyond the period authorized…at least 60 days prior to the expiration of that period, the physician or psychologist responsible for that treatment or the person responsible for the patient’s treatment under the direction and with approval of the physician or psychologist shall:

    1.    update the patient’s individualized service plan;
    2.    prepare a report containing evidence that the patient meets all requirements for available outpatient treatment; and
    3.    petition the hearing examiners appointed to hold hearings…for an order requiring the patient to obtain available outpatient treatment beyond the period previously ordered for the patient.

The petition shall contain a plain and simple statement that the patient or the patient’s representatives may file a request for a hearing…within 15 days of service of the petition…"

(c). "If a hearing is not requested…the hearing examiner shall make an independent review of the report, the service plan and the petition. If the hearing examiner concludes…that the patient is no longer a person requiring involuntary treatment, then he shall order a hearing [under § 37-3-90]." If the hearing examiner concludes that treatment shall be continued, it shall be ordered for a period not to exceed one year.

(d).  At the hearing, the hearing examiner shall order continued treatment, if the he determines the requirements of

§ 37-3-81.1(2)(a) and § 37-3-95 (court must discharge criminals to the police) are met.

§ 37-3-81.1(a)(2). The hearing examiner must determine that "…there is available outpatient treatment for the patient which meets the requirements of the plan chosen by the court and [that] the patient will likely obtain that treatment so as to minimize the likelihood of the patient’s becoming an inpatient."

27.   Describe any procedures for conservatorship, guardianship, etc., which are
           applicable to the mentally ill.

§ 37-3-1(15). "‘Representatives’ means the persons appointed…to receive notice of the proceedings for voluntary or involuntary treatment."

Appointment of Representatives:
§ 37-3-147(a). "At the time a patient is admitted to any facility under this chapter, that facility shall use diligent efforts to secure the names and addresses of at least two representatives…"

(b). "The patient may designate one representative; the second representative or, in the absence of designation of one representative by the patient, both representatives shall be selected by the facility. If the facility is to select both representatives, it must make one selection from among the following persons in the order of listing: the patient's legal guardian, spouse, adult child, parent, attorney, adult next of kin, or adult friend…" However, if the court has selected a representative for the patient, the facility must chose that representative. "The second representative shall also be selected from the above list but without regard to the order of listing, provided that the second representative shall not be the person who filed the petition to have the patient admitted to the facility."

(c). "If the facility is unable to secure at least two representatives after diligent search or if the department is the guardian of the patient…the facility shall apply to the court…" for the appointment of a guardian, other than the department.

Comment: Georgia’s Mental Health Law provides for the appointment of representatives for each mentally ill patient. The patient can choose one representative, the facility chooses the other. The representative chosen by the facility must be chosen from an ordered list, such that it will generally be a legal guardian, spouse, family member, attorney or friend, in that order.

Rights of Representatives:
§ 37-3-148(a).
"At any time and without notice, a person detained by a facility or a relative or friend on behalf of such person may petition, as provided by law, for a writ of habeas corpus to question the cause and legality of detention and to request any court of competent jurisdiction on its own initiative to issue a writ for release…"

(b). "A patient or his representatives may file a petition in the appropriate court alleging that the patient is being unjustly denied a right or privilege granted by this chapter or that a procedure authorized by this chapter is being abused. Upon the filing of such a petition, the court shall have the authority to conduct a judicial inquiry and to issue appropriate orders to correct any abuse under this chapter."

§ 37-3-22(a). A voluntary patient’s representative, legal guardian, parent, spouse, attorney, or adult next of kin may request the patient’s discharge, in writing. If the patient admitted himself/herself, voluntarily, then the person requesting discharge (other than a legal guardian) must obtain the consent of the patient. If the chief medical officer determines discharge is inappropriate, involuntary proceedings are initiated.

Comment: In addition to the rights of representatives discussed directly above, specific sections of the Georgia Code provide that representatives must receive notice of discharges and hearings.

             28.   Other.

Georgia has a "gravely disabled" standard for involuntary inpatient commitment. This is more beneficial to mentally ill, than a traditional "dangerousness" standard, however, not quite as flexible as a "need for treatment" standard. For a patient to become involuntarily committed as an outpatient, he must require "…outpatient treatment in order to avoid predictably and imminently becoming an inpatient…" and be "…unable voluntarily to seek or comply with outpatient treatment…" under § 37-3-1(12.1). This assisted outpatient treatment standard is more akin to the broader "need for treatment" standard.

While Georgia maintains two distinct standards for outpatient and inpatient involuntary commitment, the procedure for committing someone as an outpatient or an inpatient is the same in both instances. In other words, when a person is brought in to the emergency room, the certification, petition and hearing procedure allows for commitment to either an inpatient or outpatient facility, whichever best meets the needs of the patient. In the same way, when a petition is filed by someone in the community, the procedure is such that the person can be involuntarily committed as either an inpatient or outpatient. This triage, of sorts, allows for the system to meet the particular needs of the mentally ill person, in a most efficient and expeditious manner.

Another expeditious mechanism of the system is the preliminary check. Under § 37-3-83(h), when a hearing examiner finds that continued involuntary inpatient treatment is necessary, a hearing is not assisted for the inpatient to continue involuntary treatment. This allows for an inpatient to receive continued treatment on an uninterrupted basis, unless a hearing is requested by the patient or his representatives.


general resources | legal resources | medical resources | briefing papers | state activity   
hospital closures | preventable tragedies | press room | search | home

FootnoteImage2.jpg (1088 bytes)
Treatment Advocacy Center

The contents of TAC's website are copyrighted by the Treatment Advocacy Center unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved and content may be reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, or transferred, for single use, or by nonprofit organizations for educational purposes only, if correct attribution is made. TAC is an I.R.C. § 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation. Donations are appreciated and are eligible for the charitable contribution deduction under the provisions of I.R.C. § 170. Please note that TAC does not accept funding from pharmaceutical companies or entities involved in the sale, marketing, or distribution of such products.

Treatment Advocacy Center (TAC), 200 N. Glebe Road, Suite 730, Arlington, VA 22203
703 294 6001/6002 (phone) | 703 294 6010 (fax) | www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org (website)
info@treatmentadvocacycenter.org (general email) | press@treatmentadvocacycenter.org (press contact)
webmaster@treatmentadvocacycenter.org (webmaster)